<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>jeffschult.com &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jeffschult.com/blog/category/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jeffschult.com/blog</link>
	<description>"Branded for Life"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:50:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pennsylvania primary wish &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffschult.com/blog/2008/04/21/pennsylvania-primary-wish/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jeffschult.com/blog/2008/04/21/pennsylvania-primary-wish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jss</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffschult.com/blog/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have managed to stay studiously wordless about the presidential race for the entire month of the Democratic campaign in Pennsylvania. I know all about it, though. I&#8217;m glad Pennsylvanians get to make a difference of some kind. I mean, I used to be one. We weren&#8217;t bitter at all back then, either. That&#8217;s how [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have managed to stay studiously wordless about the presidential race for the entire month of the Democratic campaign in Pennsylvania. I know all about it, though. I&#8217;m glad Pennsylvanians get to make a difference of some kind. I mean, I used to be one. We weren&#8217;t bitter at all back then, either. That&#8217;s how old I am.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not making any predictions for tomorrow. But I&#8217;m hoping that enough Pennsylvanian Democrats will vote for the Democratic primary race to be over, and that means pulling the lever, or touching the screen, or making an &#8220;X,&#8221; or whatever it is you do in your town, for you-know-who. The candidate whose last name does not rhyme with &#8220;Schminton.&#8221;</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;">Update<span style="color: #000000;">: &#8220;Oh, well.&#8221; Get &#8216;em next time &#8230;</span></span></p>
<p>Later update: This seems like as good a place as any to add validation code from <a title="Where I (or anyone else?) stands ..." href="http://www.whereistand.com" target="_blank">whereistand.com</a></p>
<p><a href="http://whereistand.com/jeffbot?ref=a61d9dddcb5cd0744c43f8d71ea1fa9e"><img src="http://whereistand.com/images/i_guy.gif" alt="jeffbot - whereIstand.com" /></a></p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jeffschult.com/blog/2008/04/21/pennsylvania-primary-wish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daily Kos is (well, was) down, offline, hacked &#8230; whatever &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffschult.com/blog/2008/04/09/daily-kos-is-well-was-down-offline-hacked-whatever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jeffschult.com/blog/2008/04/09/daily-kos-is-well-was-down-offline-hacked-whatever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 16:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jss</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freepers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffschult.com/blog/?p=77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daily Kos, the biggest blog extent for Democratic politics, has been offline for about an hour as I type this; and if I were the type of blogger who lives for conspiracy theories, I would be blaming John McCain, AT&#38;T, Verizon, Hillary Clinton, General Petraeus, the freeping loons at Free Republic &#8230; the list of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dailykos.com" title="I'm sure it will be back soon ..." target="_blank">Daily Kos</a>, the biggest blog extent for Democratic politics, has been offline for about an hour as I type this; and if I were the type of blogger who lives for conspiracy theories, I would be blaming John McCain, AT&amp;T, Verizon, Hillary Clinton, General Petraeus, the <a href="http://www.freerepublic.com" title="Get over yourselves, huh? It's going to be a long 8 years for you." target="_blank">freeping loons</a> at Free Republic &#8230; the list of suspects would be longer than the number of keywords with which I might fill out this sentence to make it buzzworthy.</p>
<p>Drat. It&#8217;s back up. Never mind. Move along. Nothing to see here. <img src='http://www.jeffschult.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It was probably just some sort of server hiccup. Daily Kos is among the reasons I rarely write anything serious about politics &#8212; almost everything I might want to say gets said by *someone* there before I can get around to typing. If I&#8217;m going to write politics, I prefer to stick to humor, satire, parody, etc. and pick my spots.</p>
<p>I do have a sense that the next president of the United States is going to be Barack Obama, as in, we&#8217;ve gotten to the point where I will be surprised if anything derails him. I&#8217;m not saying this as someone who has been for him, or as someone who is jumping on the bandwagon. I think it is clear that Hillary Clinton won&#8217;t be taking the nomination from him; and that Republicans don&#8217;t have a prayer what with taking the blame for the economy being down the toilet. I wish the election could be about the stupidity of fighting a war of occupation in a country where we&#8217;re not wanted &#8230;</p>
<p>Ahh, well. <a href="http://www.dailykos.com" title="Go on, you know you want to ..." target="_blank">Daily Kos</a> is back up. I&#8217;m sure someone there already said it better, and at length.</p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jeffschult.com/blog/2008/04/09/daily-kos-is-well-was-down-offline-hacked-whatever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s the foreign policy expert?</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffschult.com/blog/2008/03/20/whos-the-foreign-policy-expert/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jeffschult.com/blog/2008/03/20/whos-the-foreign-policy-expert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jss</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffschult.com/blog/?p=68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pick the quote from the autumn of 2002 and tell me who you think has a better grasp of world affairs:
&#8220;I am very certain that this military engagement will not be very  difficult.&#8221;
&#8211; John McCain on CNN, September 12, 2002.
or:
&#8220;I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a US occupation of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pick the quote from the autumn of 2002 and tell me who you think has a better grasp of world affairs:</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;I am very certain that this military engagement will not be very  difficult</strong>.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; John McCain <a href="http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0209/12/se.06.html" title="Read the full transcript, if you want ..." target="_blank">on CNN</a>, September 12, 2002.</p>
<p>or:</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a US occupation of  undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences. I  know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong  international support will only fan the flames of the Middle  East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab  world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaeda.</strong></p>
<p><strong>&#8220;I am not opposed to all wars. I’m opposed to dumb wars.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>&#8211; Barack Obama <a href="http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Barack_Obama's_Iraq_Speech" title="Another great speech." target="_blank">speech</a>, Oct. 2, 2002</p>
<p>Just sayin&#8217;.</p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jeffschult.com/blog/2008/03/20/whos-the-foreign-policy-expert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Times Headlines &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffschult.com/blog/2008/03/12/new-york-times-headlines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jeffschult.com/blog/2008/03/12/new-york-times-headlines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jss</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[On Writing (and/or Media)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[akimbo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eliot Spitzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[execrable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffschult.com/blog/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Times is a paper I love to hate. I read it. I expect greatness from it, since it is, after all, The New York Times. I am disappointed far too often and far more than I was years ago.
Maybe my standards keep going up.  It is possible. I mean, *I* expect to keep [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/" title="Obligatory" target="_blank">The Times</a></em> is a paper I love to hate. I read it. I expect greatness from it, since it is, after all, <em>The New York Times</em>. I am disappointed far too often and far more than I was years ago.</p>
<p>Maybe my standards keep going up.  It is possible. I mean, *I* expect to keep getting better. Why can&#8217;t they?</p>
<p>But I also think <em>The Times</em> has declined gradually over the last 20 years, probably for much the same reasons that journalism has generally declined. Staff cuts. Space cuts. &#8220;Do more with less.&#8221; Etc.</p>
<p>I happen to own the domain name &#8220;notthenewyorktimes.com&#8221; &#8230; I&#8217;m getting increasingly tempted to use it. My annoyance of the day is the execrable headline:</p>
<h2> Spitzer Wrestles Over Response, Paralyzing Albany</h2>
<p>Please. Snowstorms sometimes paralyze Albany. That the guv&#8217;mint is all limbs-akimbo and that jaws are aflappin&#8217; over Eliot Spitzer&#8217;s paid womanizing does not paralyze the city, or the state. If it paralyzes the legislature, that might be an improvement.</p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jeffschult.com/blog/2008/03/12/new-york-times-headlines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spitzer wrong &#8230; and had a target on his back</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffschult.com/blog/2008/03/11/spitzer-wrong-and-had-a-target-on-his-back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jeffschult.com/blog/2008/03/11/spitzer-wrong-and-had-a-target-on-his-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jss</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eliot Spitzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fleshbot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hookers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prostitutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffschult.com/blog/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the New York governor who was once the squeaky-clean white-knight attorney general, the scourge of Wall Street, is going to resign for being outed for paying for sex with gorgeous young escorts.
I get that. It&#8217;s really hard to muster up any sympathy. It&#8217;s difficult for me to think of him now other than as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the New York governor who was once the squeaky-clean white-knight attorney general, the scourge of Wall Street, is going to resign for being outed for paying for sex with gorgeous young escorts.</p>
<p>I get that. It&#8217;s really hard to muster up any sympathy. It&#8217;s difficult for me to think of him now other than as a &#8220;doofus,&#8221; to use the technical term.</p>
<p>So what about the other Johns? What about the sex workers, that being the term I prefer to use rather than hookers, or prostitutes, or all the worsewords and phrases that people will throw around? I don&#8217;t think any of them are, ummm, going down. Just the <a href="http://www.newsday.com/news/opinion/ny-emperorsclub,0,2966631.photogallery" title="Newsweek, yummmm ..." target="_blank">Emperors Club management</a>, and Client #9, Gov. Eliot Spitzer.</p>
<p>What about Clients 1-8 and 10 to infinity? Who are they? Do we care? Does the F.B.I care? The New York Times?<span id="more-64"></span></p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t look like it, does it.</p>
<p>Lots and lots of people broke the state laws in different states, in this case. More than a million bucks got spent on sex.  It&#8217;s a drop in the bucket. Just google &#8482; <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=escort+services&amp;btnG=Google+Search" title="OK, so I did it for you ..." target="_blank">&#8220;escort services&#8221;</a>&#8230; do you think they&#8217;re all quaking in their five-inch heels?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>But I bet they&#8217;re going to start screening out politicians, if they can. Let&#8217;s be clear here &#8212; the Emperors Club was singled out because the F.B.I. and the I.R.S. were investigating Eliot Spitzer, NOT because they were (gasp) running a high-priced escort agency.</p>
<blockquote>
<p align="left"><em>&#8220;&#8230;  in the Hauppauge offices of the Internal Revenue Service, investigators conducting a routine examination of suspicious financial transactions reported to them by banks found several unusual movements of cash involving the governor of New York, several officials said. &#8220;</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p align="left">That&#8217;s what <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/11/nyregion/11inquire.html?hp" title="Revelations Began in Routine Tax Inquiry" target="_blank">The Times says</a>. I do wonder just how &#8220;routine&#8221; this investigation was. This looks like a &#8220;gotcha&#8221; over a few thousand bucks. But it&#8217;s about sex, and there&#8217;s no defense when sex in involved, when everyone, especially you, knows your pants are down &#8230; knows your spouse is pissed and your family is devastated. Eliot Spitzer, if you read between the lines, also would have preferred not to use condoms when screwing a sex worker &#8230; another kind of crime to answer for, maybe, but not in court.</p>
<p align="left">That Spitzer was stupid seems without question. But I don&#8217;t see anyone &#8212; even over at, say, Fleshbot, which has <a href="http://fleshbot.com/366262/the-curious-case-of-client-no-9-an-honest-to-goodness-political-sex-scandal" title="Click it. You know you want to." target="_blank">some otherwise excellent commentary</a> &#8212; noting the likelihood that the banks and the feds were probably looking for anything they could get on the doofus governor of New York, who, after all, had made a shitload of enemies in his career.</p>
<p align="left">I think the odds are 50-50 on whether Spitzer gets prosecuted &#8230; because the government really does not want to take the time to round up and make cases against all the other clients and the sex workers, and the government is going to feel like it has to do that in order to prosecute the former prosecutor.</p>
<p align="left">But they might not. They might just decide he&#8217;s special, even though he isn&#8217;t. It would be a shame, maybe, if he took a bunch of otherwise OK sex workers and rich Johns down with him &#8230;</p>
<p align="left"><font color="#ff0000">Update:</font> Check out the questions and suspicions of a former Department of Justice lawyer <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/3/11/51123/3435/851/474082" title="IANAL ... :-)" target="_blank">here</a>. Or, similarly &#8230; go check out <a href="http://harpers.org/archive/2008/03/hbc-90002589" title="etc. This isn't over." target="_blank">&#8220;It looks like the Bush Justice Department just bagged themselves another Democratic Governor&#8221;</a> &#8230;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jeffschult.com/blog/2008/03/11/spitzer-wrong-and-had-a-target-on-his-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

